There’s always something to howl about.

Ahem: Your goal is not weblog traffic, your goal is converted sales

It might seem like I’m shouting up the drain pipe, but I’m not talking to Dustin — I’m talking to you.

If you were selling a viral product like Skype, where for every 10,000 people with a casual interest in your product, one will turn into a paying customer — with the cost per conversion approaching zero dollars — what Dustin is saying would make sense.

But selling real estate is a direct marketing problem. If 10,000 people exhibit a casual interest in your product, you will have earned nothing, whereas if one person actually buys, you will have earned a huge pay-check.

There’s more: If you are spending some significant fraction of your time servicing inquiries from people who will not be buying your product, you will have less time — possibly no time — to work with the small number of people who will buy your product — from someone else if not from you.

Your goal is not weblog traffic. Your goal is converted sales. This is not news. This is me, from last March:

“Traffic is not about traffic. Traffic is about conversions.”

If you get 3,000 unique hits every day and convert one a month, you are an emaciated wretch with huge bragging rights. If you get three unique hits a day and convert one a week, you are constantly trying and failing to make time between appointments to get your Lexus detailed. Your goal is not traffic. Your goal is not even community, although this is a vitally-important secondary objective. Your goal is not forms filled out or leads captured or phone calls returned or listings emailed or showings scheduled. Your goal is conversions, as represented by a fat check from a title company. It does not matter how many shots you take at the basket. What matters is how many times — and how often and how regularly — you get the ball through the cylinder.

I pointed out that the False Dichotomy of schmoozing with the homies versus counting flowers on the wall is a logical fallacy. Your objective is not to be tripped-upon by accident by any one of Earth’s billions, but to be well-known — and well-trusted — within your target market.

And that goal may not be best-served by weblogging at all. Or, if it is, the best weblog for you to work on may not be your own. If there is a strong weblog — or Yahoo group or printed newsletter or whatever — focused on your targeted audience, you might be better off devoting most of your limited writing time there.

BloodhoundRealty.com, our brokerage, target markets by selling our listings in ways that attract the attention of other homeowners. Our on-line efforts support that marketing, but it’s the “Sold” sign that does the heavy lifting. Russell Shaw weblogs here and here only, talking only to other real estate professionals. Sixty-five percent of his mega-producing business comes from radio and TV advertising — the stuff we all insist does not work any longer.

But even if you insist that a real estate weblog is the only way to go, it remains that something like Jay Thompson’s “PhoenixRealEstateGuy.com” business cards placed in the actual hands of your actual targeted prospects is a lot more likely to get those people to your weblog that pursuing random search-engine effects. Your objective is conversions, not traffic and not mere leads. Ergo, one person putting your blog into his favorites menu or subscribing to your RSS feed or to your email updates is a lot more valuable than 100 people bouncing into and right out of your weblog — ferried in by search queries that may or may not have anything to do with real estate in your target market.

Dustin’s solution is not wrong. He’s just solving the wrong marketing problem. Your objective is not traffic, which definitely can be obtained by viral marketing tactics. Your objective is converted sales, the direct marketing problem. Relying on viral marketing strategies to solve direct marketing problems is an error.

 
Addendum: I posted this as a comment at 4Realz:

At the risk of driving poor Joseph Ferrara even farther around the bend, I will add this and then make my exit:

Inlookers: If, like Dustin and major brokerages, you are producing on-line content in order to attract leads that you will then sell to third parties, by all means go viral. Your acquisition cost is low, and the consequences of low quality contacts are borne by others.

If, on the other hand, you are a guerrilla, a grunt on the ground producing on-line content to attract clients to your own business, you are engaged in direct marketing. The quality of your contacts matters a great deal, since focusing your limited resources on the wrong people will cost you the money you would have earned by working with the right people.

And remember: Your objective in taking on your own marketing is not buying leads.

In the last 30 days, 2,197 unique souls visited BloodhoundBlog 200 or more times. It turns out they were all sellers! Who knew? 😉

Technorati Tags: , , ,