There’s always something to howl about.

Month: September 2007 (page 3 of 6)

Fed trades a sharp pain, quick recovery for extended convalescence

This is my column this week from the Arizona Republic (permanent link):

 
Fed trades a sharp pain, quick recovery for extended convalescence

As I write this the Federal Reserve Bank just cut its federal funds rate and also its discount rate, both by half-a-percent. The Fed doesn’t control mortgage interest rates, but, for good or ill, it does have a powerful influence on every aspect of the American economy. These rate cuts send a very strong signal that the central bank intends to stave off any impending liquidity crisis.

So what just happened? We are almost certainly about to enter a time of financial distress — if not a recession then something very close to it. The nation’s central bankers have opted for a longer period of lower-level pain over a brief but very intense agony. It’s as if your broken leg were healing badly, and, rather than re-breaking the bone, your doctor elected to correct the defect with braces, weights and painful exercises.

Which would you choose if you had a choice — a quick, intense pain or a long, drawn-out recovery? It doesn’t matter. You don’t have a choice.

Starting with the dot.com collapse and accelerating with 9/11, the Fed has pumped the American economy full of money. To the extent that that money was wisely invested in increased productivity, it was well used. To the extent it was wasted, it will have to be redeemed — like a bad check hanging over your credit rating.

This is the financial distress we have to look forward to. Given a choice, you might swallow hard and live through that short spasm of agony. Instead, the Fed’s action this week may turn a short-term crisis into a long-term syndrome. Rather than re-breaking the bone, living through the healing and getting back to work, we could be spending the next few years on financial crutches.

On the plus side of the ledger, mortgage rates should go down in the immediate future. It remains to be seen if this will bring buyers out, but this may turn out to be an opportune time to refinance mortgages or home-equity lines Read more

Herd dinosaurs? Not me, but what should we do instead?

Responding at some length to a comment from Charles Woodall:

> Changing the real estate business in the grassroots effort you suggest would be a slow process as well.

I know you’re not joking with me, but are you aware of how quickly the real estate industry is changing right now? None of this is happening through the NAR cartel.

> it would literally take thousands or ten of thousands of people to make it happen.

Shazam! Here we are. BloodhoundBlog is just a part of the changes taking place, but we talk to tens of thousands of unique souls every month.

> We already have a powerful trade organization in place, so getting a few hundred people involved would be easier, in my humble opinion.

You’ve already talked about how it was virtually impossible for you to make an obviously necessary change. The NAR exists to milk agents, consumers and the taxpayers, in that order. It will not even try to do anything else until it is much too late to make any difference.

> While your thoughts are noble, and I agree on several points, until leadership in REALTOR associations on the local and state level want to move into the 21st century, it just isn’t going to happen.

It’s not going to happen.

> Folks such as yourself getting involved will be required.

First, people like me will never get involved with the NAR. I personally am deeply philosophically opposed to what I consider to be the criminal objectives of the NAR, but even someone less philosophically fastidious is going to achieve far better results by improving his own mind, rather than wasting vast amounts of time trying to herd mental dinosaurs toward a future they despise and think they can avoid.

There are actually three issues that you are raising.

The first is that I — or someone like me — would be profited by participating in any sort of committee work, even if it didn’t involve lobbying the state to point its guns at innocent people. Assuming a committee can learn anything at all, it cannot learn any faster than its slowest member, and committees seem to me Read more

Ave atque vale: Bidding farewell to Ben

My father-in-law, Ben Collins, passed away Monday afternoon. I’ve been dealing with our work since then while Cathy worked on the preparations for the funeral. Starting this afternoon we’re both tied up for a bit.

I hadn’t intended to write about this, but I also hadn’t intended to cry for the man. He was a warhorse, a giant among men, a champion of every virtue I admire on this earth. I’m very proud to have known him. Even so, I thought I would be practical enough to be phlegmatic about his death. It turns out I was wrong.

This is for Cathy, because she loves it:

And this is for Ben, may he rest in peace:

A Cowboy’s Prayer

by Badger Clark

Oh Lord, I’ve never lived where churches grow.
        I loved creation better as it stood
That day You finished it so long ago
        And looked upon Your work and called it good.
I know that others find You in the light
        That’s sifted down through tinted window panes,
And yet I seem to feel You near tonight
        In this dim, quiet starlight on the plains.

I thank You, Lord, that I am placed so well,
        That You have made my freedom so complete;
That I’m no slave of whistle, clock or bell,
        Nor weak-eyed prisoner of wall and street,
Just let me live my life as I’ve begun
        And give me work that’s open to the sky;
Make me a pardner of the wind and sun,
        And I won’t ask a life that’s soft or high.

Let me be easy on the man that’s down;
        Let me be square and generous with all.
I’m careless sometimes, Lord, when I’m in town,
        But never let ’em say I’m mean or small!
Make me as big and open as the plains,
        As honest as the hawse between my knees,
Clean as the wind that blows behind the rains,
        Free as the hawk that circles down the breeze!

Forgive me, Lord, if sometimes I forget.
        You know about the reasons that are hid.
You understand the things that gall and fret;
        You know me better than my mother did.
Just keep an eye on all that’s done and said
        And right me, sometimes, when I turn aside,
And guide me down the long, dim trail ahead
        That stretches upward Read more

Municipalities aren’t very good internet service providers; spotty garbage collection could have been a clue

From USA Today:

Plans to blanket cities across the nation with low-cost or free wireless Internet access are being delayed or abandoned because they are proving to be too costly and complicated.

Houston, San Francisco, Chicago and other cities are putting proposed Wi-Fi networks on hold.

“Wi-Fi woes everywhere you turn,” says Russell Hancock of Silicon Valley Network, a troubled Wi-Fi project for 40 towns in California’s high-tech corridor.

Wi-Fi allows laptop users to work anywhere, making some jobs portable. It also is essential to mobile devices, including iPhones, enabling such emerging technology to perform complex online tasks fast.

Chicago couldn’t reach agreement with service providers after offering free use of street lamps for radio transmitters in exchange for a network built, owned and operated by providers at no cost to the city.

“All these big city projects were doomed to failure because they were too complicated,” says Glenn Fleishman of Wi-Fi Networking News.

Cities are bad at doing simple jobs like picking up the garbage. Why would anyone think they could manage ISPs?

I love this observation: “St. Louis is trying to figure out how to power Wi-Fi transmitters on 1,700 street lights when they’re not illuminated without spending millions of dollars.” I know! Solar power! Wishful thinking plus wishful thinking equals fait accompli.

Take heart, though. Wishful thinking is how we can know for sure that monopoly technology rammed down our throats by thumb-sucking dilberts will be even better than what we might have chosen for ourselves…

Technorati Tags: ,

Zillow.com snares another $30 million in venture capital

VentureBeat:

Zillow, the controversial website that gives value estimates of people’s homes and other real estate info, has raised a significant $30 million of funding, despite the mortgage industry credit crunch.

The Seattle company has now raised a hefty $87 million in total funding during its short lifetime, making it one of the most richly backed of the new era of “Web 2.0″ Internet companies.

The round was led by Legg Mason Capital Management. Previous backers Benchmark Capital, Technology Crossover Ventures and PAR Capital all participated.

Opened in early 2005 by the founders of Expedia, Zillow started out as a portal for information about homes around the country. Over time, it has added on sales components for owners and real estate agents, and also provides a place for buyers to discuss or ask questions about a property.

Only last month, we reported that competitor site Redfin had landed $12 million in funding, led by Draper Fisher Jurvetson. Trulia, the other main player in the Web 2.0 real estate space, pulled in $10 million in May. Terabitz, started by a teenager, raised $10 million in July (our coverage).

Asked whether this most recent funding round has anything to do with the real estate slowdown, chief financial officer Spencer Rascoff told me that there was no relation. Rather, it had to do with the company’s focus on employing plenty of skilled developers and improving the site.

The country’s real estate troubles may indirectly benefit the Zillow, though; real estate agents desperate to sell homes are far more likely to post their offerings online, sacrificing some control in exchange for having more people see their properties.

Nota bene: Revised to reflect changes in VentureBeat’s story.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Are You Better Off Now Than You Were Four Years Ago?

Ronald Reagan asked us that question in the 1980 Presidential debate. The obvious answer, in 1980, was NO.

Are we better off now, in the real estate markets, than we were four years ago? I think the obvious answer is YES. Now, bubble bloggers and end of the world prognosticators will most likely throw out graphs, cite the reasons for a depression, and suggest that Greenspan created an artificial bubble.

The problem with bloggers is that we have a short-term memory. We should; we’re rewarded for doing just that. Let me give you an example: I tripled my page views by covering the Countrywide Financial crisis on my home weblog. If I want more traffic, all I have to do is research the referring search terms and tailor my new content to those interests. The result? An exponential climb in page views.

Bloggers are rewarded for living in the moment not for seeking the truth (or a deeper understanding of it).

How different is your net worth today from 2005? Well, if you’re in San Clemente, CA, Goodyear, AZ, Naples, FL, or Henderson, NV, it’s probably down. These four areas have been brutally hammered with foreclosures while the rest of the country has been riding out this slowdown. And that makes good headlines fodder for the mainstream media and good page view bait for the real estate weblogger.

How different is your net worth in the aforementioned cities if you bought, say, four years ago– in 2003? It’s pretty darned good ! In 2003, a home in Goodyear, AZ could be had for about $200,000. That home may have risen to a peak of $325,000 in 2005. It may have retreated to $275,000 today. Let’s say it drops to $240,000 in two years. A 20% down payment (of $40,000) would have doubled in value in a six year period. The debt service could be written off to rent collected or opportunity cost (rent that would have been paid). The resulting return on equity, for that Read more

Heaven is made real when the weather breaks in Phoenix

The weather broke “officially” last Tuesday. I could see it in the quality of the light, but we had lingering humidity from a Gulf hurricane. The last of that fell as rainfall on Monday afternoon, and by dusk it was obvious that the Arizona Monsoon was over.

It’s 97 degrees and nine percent humidity right now, and you have no way of appreciating how wonderful that is unless you live here. With the occasional break for light rainfail, we’re looking at ten solid months of truly heavenly weather.

The Monsoon is brutal, but it only lasts for two months. The trade-off is this: Crisp, clean, dry air, with light of a clarity and perfection you can’t achieve in a studio. In Phoenix, you can train your eyes to see the quality of the atmosphere by the color of the sunlight. On a perfect day — and they are legion — the shadows are sharp enough to cut your eyes.

The rest of the world dreams of heaven. In Phoenix, we live it…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Chicken Soup to Social Responsibility – Damn, I’m a Paradox

I don’t pretend to understand the half of what Greg is trying to convey. This much, however, I will confess. Government is necessary, coalitions have value, and social responsibility is incumbent on all of us.

Slam zoning laws if you must, but if, as a homeowner, you suddenly find yourself sharing responsibility for maintenance of your side yard fence with the owners of the strip club next door, you will undoubtedly see some benefit in government intervention. I did time in Houston; I know of what I speak. If you loathe the union that professes to defend your profession and your livelihood, consider that you have choices. These choices may include speaking from a pulpit of change and reform while all the while paying your member dues or, alternatively, resigning and declaring free agent status. And if you detest government intervention in any form, consider that it is necessary for an orderly, progressive, sustainable society.

Who is not to blame for the mortgage mess? Take one step back. As lenders, money was flowing from the spigot like there was no tomorrow. As mortgage brokers, there was money to be made by cranking the faucet, and it was a foot race to see who could get to the sink first. As agents, we sang the “Houses are expensive, but money is cheap” refrain until we were blue in the face. And, as for the consumer, it really doesn’t matter in the final analysis whether they were motivated by necessity, opportunity or unadulterated greed.  We all helped make this bed in which we now must lie.

Kudos to the Feds for being reactive if not proactive. Without a decisive response to our current situation, water under the bridge be damned, many innocent and not so innocent citizens would continue to suffer. Libertarianism is just ducky, ducky, that is, until the basic fundamentals are violated. The human condition all but guarantees that our unchecked actions will affect those around us.

Government regulation does not, did not, result in loan fraud or financial overcommitment. Government regulation can not be fingered for the shortcomings of the lending or real estate professions. Government intervention is neither the cause Read more

No committee will ever make the Cluetrain run on time

Proposition 1: Groups, clubs, committees and professional associations would make better decisions if their smarter, more passionate members were to get involved.

Proposition 2: Central banking would work if only Alan Greenspan had a smarter brother.

Proposition 3: True Communism has never been tried.

I don’t consider these statements equivalent, but they are of the same species, the Wishful Thinking Fallacy.

Inasmuch as we are living through the nightmare of Proposition 2, one might think we could learn a lesson. We won’t, and every eye was on the Fed this afternoon.

Parents who wrote a fat check for a skinny college Freshman in August can expect the return on their investment in the form of Proposition 3 over Thanksgiving dinner.

From Proposition 1, though, there is not even the comic relief of a sardonic resignation. We want so desperately for it to be true that we will not even consider entertaining the obvious truth that all committees suck, and good committees suck the least when they adjourn early.

These three propositions are alike in another way, a way that illustrates why they are uniformly false, any devout wishing to the contrary: All three turn on a power devoid of consequences. They are fundamentally anti-Capitalist. Their errors are not correctable accidents, they are a necessary consequence of the caprice that is the opposite of Capitalism:

But in fact, in politics and economics, the opposite of capitalism is caprice. A government’s decisions are not awful because they are always corrupt — although they often are. They are awful because there is no reward for being right, no penalty for being wrong, and no one anywhere to take responsibility for anything either way.

Capitalism is not instantly rational — it is not always automatically right about what to do, where and in what quantity. But capitalism is ultimately rational. In due course, entrepreneurs will achieve something approaching optimal results. Why? Because they are rewarded for being right, penalized for being wrong, and they are proud to take responsibility for their endeavors.

Matthew Hardy left what I thought was a brilliant comment to my post on technological ineptitude at the Arizona Association of Realtors:

So the Read more

World Cup Real Estate

Time for blogging is often hard to find. Most posts are begun on one day and finished some other, and usually it’s for the best. I started this post yesterday, and it got a bit gummed up. Nineteen hours and one Kris Berg post later, and I’m good to go. And there are important things happening in real estate, but sorry Greg, there are no big thoughts in this post. This is simply my entry for the Dumbest Post of the Week category. 

Kris uses chicken soup, my unlikely source of inspiration and motivation comes from rugby. Yes rugby. That is the sport of kings, isn’t it? Well then, it’s the sport of titans.

I discovered rugby last Sunday and now that I know the truth, and I’ll step up and say it- rugby is the greatest sport invented. I don’t know the rules. I don’t know the terminology. I don’t know the teams or the players, but sitting in front of the big plasma TV, none of that matters one bit. Here’s what I see: Two teams of grown men completely driven to play a sport that is both brutal and strategic, physical and mental, dependent on both teamwork and individual skills, and requiring both tactical knowledge and gut instincts. And it is beautiful to watch.

There is a ball, of sorts. It’s thrown, kicked, pitched, or carried toward a goal. Players get tackled and men often pile on top of the ball. In a football game that would be where the play ends. In rugby? I don’t know what happens. Sometimes the play ends but often, just when you think it’s over, you are waiting to hear a whistle. You wait for a referee. You wait for the players to unpile themselves and…It doesn’t happen. Seconds pass. What is going on in that pile? Where’s the whistle? Where’s the ball? You are waiting, willing something to happen. Then, from the bottom of the mound of players, the ball comes flying forth to be kicked or pitched or carried forward once more! It’s such thrilling madness! Who would play such a sport? What would motivate grown men to participate in such an intense spectacle of sheer Read more

Federal funds rate cut by a half-point

Here:

The Federal Open Market Committee cut its benchmark federal funds rate by a half percentage point to 4.75%. In an effort to ease the credit crunch, the Federal Reserve also reduced its discount rate in lockstep to 5.25%. This is the first cut in the federal funds rate since June 2003. In a statement, the FOMC said the action “was necessary to forestall some of the adverse effects on the broad economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and to promote moderate growth over time.” The Fed said that some inflation risks remain. It said the credit crunch could hurt the economy.

Technorati Tags: ,

Chicken Soup for Your Business

chicken-soup.jpg

April Groves shared her thoughts on how mundane tasks often tend to produce seemingly unrelated benefits. I love this post – Whether, as April suggests, it is the ordinary act of house cleaning (okay, not so ordinary in my house) which inspires healthy eating or the simple ritual of applying make-up which increases productivity, random tasks can work to produce surprising results. (I can’t leave this last “make-up thing” without warning April that when her odometer nears a significant roll-over milestone as mine is, the task of “putting on one’s face” becomes about as simple as engineering a space station).

April is right, though – We needn’t surrender our lives and our work to a constant state of entropy. And yes, you naysayers, there is a real estate connection in all of this. I think it is safe to say that we all from time to time find ourselves either on a low boil or losing steam. We all periodically risk burn-out.  Let’s call it Business Block, and sometimes the answer isn’t to do more of what got you into this place, but to recognize your motivating triggers. I have my own mechanisms for harnessing the energy to refocus.  I make chicken soup – Using the Suzuki method. No defined recipe, but just a lot of seemingly unrelated stuff from the pantry which sounds good and I intuitively know will make me hungry again.

Dress for Success

I remember my elementary school dress code. Skirts or dresses for the girls were required. The argument was that we would be more inclined to learn if we dressed the part; sloppy appearances would translate to sloppy attitudes and shorter attention spans. Today, many light years later, this is just silly. Blue jeans don’t symbolize a day off – Ask any Microsoft employee. For me, they symbolize “no appointments” and therefore a “back office day”. My most productive back office days come courtesy of Abercrombie and Fitch. Unfortunately, Steve’s “back office day” uniform involves a pair of hideous day-glo orange shorts which, ironically, work the same magic for me. They send me running for the office.

Blogging

Some days there is just no wind in Read more

New Times likes the present: Smarmy, tendentious blather wants to be free!

Even a blind pig can find an acorn now and then, and, in that spirit, The New York Times has discovered that cowering behind a paywall is a profitless pursuit of irrelevance. More from TechCrunch:

The history of paid content goes back to the collapse of the Web 1.0 bubble, a time before content monetization was a sure bet through programs such as Google Adsense and others. There was a backlash against free content for a while, and a number of companies launched pay-to-view programs. The New York Times was one of the last to maintain this model.

Surely, with the Wall Street Journal being acquired by News Corp, the WSJ pay-to-view program must now be on death row. Similarly, the Australian Financial Review’s paid AFR.com service has been rumored to be on its last legs for some time, and will shortly close.

Most importantly: this is a win for all of us. The notion of paying to access content is flawed in a connected online world where virtually everything is free, particularly content. Companies such as the NY Times can make money from providing content for free. The fall of the model for all publications is nigh.

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Odysseus Medal: Propagating better ideas in real estate by celebrating better ideas in real estate

This is probably not much of a secret, but I really love ideas. I think the argument that smart people can improve the NAR cartel from the inside is absurd, but the instant form of the claim — that I could advance Realtors’ use of technology by wasting my time at committee meetings — is especially specious. It’s no goal of mine to change any life but my own, but, even so, the best technological benefit I can bring to Realtors, lenders, investors and thoughtful consumers is right here: Explicating our own new ideas and and drawing attention to other peoples’ innovations. Ideas are an attribute of active minds, and minds and meetings are sets with the tiniest of intersections.

Among all the other virtues I might claim for it, The Odysseus Medal competition is a celebration of great ideas in real estate. Here are this week’s winners:

This week’s Odysseus Medal goes to Dan Melson for Should Lenders Be Permitted to Sell Real Estate?:

Let us ask about real estate which has become owned by the lender. Why should lenders lack an ability shared by every other citizen, resident, illegal alien, and even people who have never set foot in the country – the ability to sell their own property? There’s no requirement for anyone else to use an agent. It may be smart to use an agent, but everyone else has the legal right to go it on their own. Why not lenders?

I’ll tell you why. Because not only would lenders being able to get into the business threaten the interests of the major chains that control most real estate, but this requires lenders to pay those same firms money if they want to get the property from their bad loans sold – and they need to get the property sold.

I have to admit, I’m not exactly eager to compete with yet more big corporations with huge advertising budgets. It remains the right thing to do. Right for the industry, and right for the consumers. As I’ve said many times before, rent-seeking is repugnant, and that’s what NAR is doing – seeking Read more