There’s always something to howl about.

Tag: NAR (page 1 of 1)

Rethinking Real Estate Web 2.0

What do consumers want? I believe this question has been asked ten times to Sunday as it relates to real estate.

I recently read Marc Davison’s recent blog post at 1000Watt Blog summarizing the results of that exact question, What do Consumers Want?.  The report, commissioned by Keller Williams, was developed and written by an impressive list of MBAs and PhDs.  With that amount of intellectual firepower, it is often difficult to question its credibility.

In addition to the report commissioned by Keller Williams, MBA and PhD’s et al, I read a synopsis of NAR’s buyer and seller’s survey, essentially providing the statistics behind today’s buyers and sellers as well as their needs.   I honed in a three key points in NAR’s report:

1.  “Home buyers are consistent in their expectations of real estate agents. Buyers thought the most important agent services are helping find the right house, and negotiating sales terms and price. Because agents often are chosen based on a referral, or were used in a previous transaction, two-thirds of buyers contacted only one real estate agent in the search process.”

2.  “Primarily, sellers want agents to price their home competitively, market the property, find a buyer and sell within a specific timeframe.”

3.  “The most difficult tasks reported by unrepresented sellers are selling within the planned length of time, getting the right price, preparing the home for sale, and understanding and performing paperwork.”

What I found interesting about the Keller William’s report was its premise –  How do you go about the process of selecting an agent?  What I found interesting about the NAR report was that the premise was more consumer centric, not agent centric.

The question I pose is how many of the current RE Web 2.0 solutions have truly “blue sky” functionality?  What if the premise assumed that there was no real estate agent?   What if a solution existed that allowed the consumer to buy and sell real estate at will without the use of a professional?

Ok – now don’t excommunicate me.  I think from a technology perspective, I believe it is a very valid question.  All too often, solutions are Read more

An NAR Challenge

I recently found myself in the unenviable position of taking a good long look in the mirror.  Not your typical mirror on the wall (although I often find that to be no picnic either), but the metaphysical mirror; the “pot calling the kettle black” kind of mirror.  I often comment on posts (lately they have been Barry’s) decrying what I perceive to be criticism without construction.  But as soon as the topic turns to our beloved NAR (a favorite around the BloodhoundBlog), I join the nattering nabobs of negativism.  Barry’s post on the NAR’s recent attempt at a technological video is the latest example.  At last count there were 66 comments and I am in there at least twice with some snide sizzle and no meat.  (Hello pot, you’re black!)  But there are also some comments from Ian Smith, one of the people vested with producing the video.  He came into what can only be described as hostile territory and acquitted himself quite well.

So here is what I propose.  The contributors, commenters and readers of BloodhoundBlog may very well constitute the premiere brain trust in RE2.0.  We complain, sometimes with great vitriol, that we would like to see more from the NAR and here is our chance.  I challenge as many of you as possible to step up in the comments to this post and offer your services to Ian for the production of these videos (I’ll start if off below).  I imagine we have many experts here abouts: video, editing, graphics, music, writing, production, agent advice, technological advice and so on.  Ian, your challenge is to get whatever bureacratic sign-offs you need in order to open the project up to some expert volunteer help.  The progress will be reported from time to time right here on BloodhoundBlog and we can all take a hand in improving that which we so often pillory.