There’s always something to howl about.

Ask the Broker: Buy now? Buy later?

This question concerns the Phoenix-area, but feel free to answer it for your own local market — just tell us where you are.

Which would be more attractive? The 8 month market or the 14 month?

I’m literally on the CUSP of being able to buy and with kids already transferring schools, the sooner the better in order to get some stability.

I’ve seen new home builders drop their prices pretty heavily or offer deep incentives. One of them has a home for around the 300k mark in Gilbert that’d be PERFECT. While I could make the payment now, I have been married to a house and that’s the worst type of one-way relationship. I don’t plan on doing it again anytime soon. Additionally, they just reduced prices 50k and are ALSO offering 20k in upgrades or a FREE Car/Truck (a Ford financed for 30 years is anything but free).

So with having settled on the fact renting the larger home I need and finishing another 6 month lease around 3/1/08 would put me at a greater financial advantage to tackle the home I have my eyes on, I question whether it’d be worth the higher payments for a shorter lease (as it’s on a home not an apartment), or if the market will be depressed enough to go the long haul at 12 months and spend more time preparing and saving.

I figured I’d shake my magic 8-blog (see what I did there? It’s a clever Monday!) and ask away. If you were advising a client on the buying side of life on how long to hold out if holding out was all they could do – Would you suggest holding on 8 months or 14?

Part of me says throwing money away on renting an additional 6 months is wasteful, the other part says that it’d allow me to save up for the stuff I’ll need to make the house a home. At a savings of around 500-600/month, that adds up to a few extra grand after 6 months.

The mention of a 40 year loan got me thinking more about affordability and financing. Figured I’d ask the pros πŸ™‚

Here’s a mild surprise: For the kind of house you’re interested in, average values were up almost one percent in April. But those same values are off 12.16% from the peak in December 2005. And while The Republic claims to see a light at the end of the tunnel, inventories on these homes — newer, suburban single-family residences — have been fairly constant for months. Right now, there is a 7.5 month supply of these homes on the market — not awful compared to other products, but nothing to drive prices up in a red-hot hurry.

The other end of this is the possibility that interest rates might go up significantly as time goes by. Lately the news is all pretty good, but no one knows when the market might turn.

If we had two or three months in a row of appreciation of at least half-a-percent, I would say jump and hold your breath. A single month is as likely to be an anomaly as it is a trend. And for all of Gilbert’s many strengths in sustaining home values, I see it as being particularly vulnerable to the negative effects of high gasoline prices.

All that said, I think the marginal risk of taking the shorter lease is probably worth it. The crushing disappointment of the bubbleheads is clearly on the horizon, and the shorter term is a reasonable trade-off on the risk of higher interest rates. If this advice turns out to be in error — I can’t guarantee anything, after all — the marginal cost should be relatively small.

Inlookers: What say you?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,