There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Marketing (page 143 of 191)

Retire? Retire early? Retire wealthy? Unthinkable!

Who wants to think about retirement? I really love to work, and it seems probable that I will continue to churn away until the hardware fails. But I know that at some point I want to stop having to worry about money. I want to write books and explore ruins and compose sappy love poetry in Latin. These are jobs that don’t pay much.

The funny thing is, although I haven’t done much to prepare for my own retirement, I’ve helped a lot of other people prepare for theirs. How? With real estate, of course. Several of my investors are on course to reap over $1,000,000 in profits from their real estate investments alone.

So, not to sound too much like an infomercial testimonial, I know how much wealth can be accrued through judicious real estate investing.

BloodhoundBlog contributor Jeff Brown has just published a White Paper on the power of real estate investing for building your retirement portfolio:

For many Americans, the thought of comfortably retiring before the age of 60 is simply out of the question. The notion of calling it quits and relaxing is appealing, but reality always seems to ruin the party.

Many folks are resolved to working forever—just to squeeze by.

Are you financially prepared to retire on schedule?

Are your investment decisions securing your retirement OR are you simply playing “not to lose?”

It’s not too late to alter your course.

Real estate investing is a proven way to secure retirement and grow your net worth. With careful planning and the proper guidance, you can retire ahead of schedule.

Working with Stelzner Consulting, Jeff outlines the basics of real estate investing for retirement planning purposes. For many readers here, the material may seem basic — or maybe not — but it will be eye-opening to your clients — or to your parents.

Nobody wants to get old, but only happy consequences will result from thinking about your retirement “too early.” Either you’ll be able to retire sooner, or you’ll be much wealthier when you do retire.

Technorati Tags: ,

Market today should dictate price of home

This is me in today’s Arizona Republic (permanent link):

 
Market today should dictate price of home

How much effort should you put into listing your home for sale?

After the past 15 months, that’s almost a silly question. There are more than 40,000 homes for sale in Maricopa County, with an average time on market of almost four months.

How much effort should you expend to sell your home? Whatever it takes.

We tend to be very careful about the listings we’ll take, because we want our homes sold in four days or four weeks, not four months.

But that leads us to the most important thing you can do to make sure your home sells while others languish: Price it to the market.

Home values in the West Valley are down 12 to 15 percent from the peak. If you’re pricing to the peak market and not this one, your house will not sell.

I want to talk about some innovative marketing ideas, but no amount of marketing can overcome a too-high price. If you are unwilling to price your home to the market, you might as well spare yourself the agony of listing it.

Now let’s go through the home and repair everything. You don’t need to remodel — unless you really do — but everything should work as advertised.

Have your Realtor walk through your home. Anything that you feel the impulse to call attention to, or to divert attention from, should be repaired or replaced. Your most sales-worthy competition is in turnkey condition. So should you be.

Your Realtor should either be a home stager or have a relationship with one. Either way, an expert needs to go through your home with a critical eye, giving you room-by-room instructions on what to get rid of, what to pack away, what to move, what to emphasize.

Your stager might add furniture or decor items, or it may be sufficient to redeploy the things you already own. The point is to enable buyers to move themselves in psychologically, without your own lives getting in the way.

Next week, we’ll talk about some passive marketing tools that can swing the balance your way.

Technorati Read more

Lucky number 13: James Hsu, a math god for our pantheon

Today we are adding contributor number 13, James Hsu:

James Hsu is a Realtor and Real Estate Investor working in suburban Seattle. From math to computer science to medicine to web development, James may be the whole Realtor 2.0 package personified.

These capsule biographies are cruel in their brevity, so here is what James said in his own behalf:

I’m a Realtor in the greater Seattle area (Mill Creek to be specific). Trained in the art of math and computer science (and a few years in pre-med), I spent a number of years in web development and then jumped into the telecom world doing product development for a major carrier. When I realized my life had become the script out of Office Space, I turned what I had been doing as a hobby (real estate investing) into my new career path. Outside of real estate, my wife and I have a two-year old son and I’m learning about commercial properties. I’ve found that the numbers game that I love is much more complicated and fun in the commercial world. However, it’s the people in residential sales that makes me smile at the end of a 12-hr work day. When I have time, my other interests are playing sports and video games.

James has his own weblog, Northwest Real Estate Update, which is how we discovered him. James puts everything through a rigorous analysis, but his writing is always thoughtful, readable and fun. We’re honored to have him on board.

As a house-keeping matter, on the subject of feed-guarding, we have added a copyright notice to our about page:

Blanket assertion of copyright: Weblog entries, images, audio or audio-visual content and comments on BloodhoundBlog are the exclusive intellectual property of their authors and are used and archived here by permission. In addition, the form and substance, look and feel, images and user interfaces of BloodhoundBlog, its syndication feeds and any derivative variations thereof are the exclusive intellectual property of BloodhoundRealty.com, LLC, an Arizona corporation. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. Republication or resyndication of content originating on BloodhoundBlog in any form without expressed, written permission from BloodhoundRealty.com, LLC, is prohibited. Read more

RE.tube? RE.cast? Envisioneering a YouTube-like distribution system for RE.net podcasts . . .

The folks at Zillow Blog and Mike’s Corner have been working on a great new idea:

How about a YouTube-like system for distributing RE.net podcasts? Content originators would submit their podcasts to a server run by Mike Price’s MLPodcast, and then that content would be available from any RE.net weblog running a widget to be built by MLPodcast.

The benefit to individual RE.net weblogs? The demands on your file server and its bandwidth are off-loaded to specialized multi-media content servers. Plus which, your podcasts get a much wider distribution.

Is there a downside? People may find your content at other sites, which may be an issue for ad-supported weblogs.

There are big questions to be settled, so now is the time to speak up if you are interested:

1. What kind of content should be accepted, and what should be omitted? Feelings are running strongly against spammy or self-promotional podcasts — for instance, video virtual tours of listed homes.

2. How local is too local? Obviously I am strongly biased in favor of general-interest, nationally-focused and industry-oriented podcasts. Should locally-focused podcasts be accepted, and, if so, should any limits obtain on what kind of local content should be accepted?

3. What’s a good length? I personally prefer podcasts that run from 45-75 minutes, the length of a good workout. The Sales Success podcasts we’re putting together will run from 10-30 minutes. What do you think is a good length?

4. Finally, do you have plans either to create or to subscribe to real estate podcasts, and, if so, would a system like this appeal to you?

Other RE.net weblogs will be entertaining these ideas as well, so speak up if you want to be heard…

Technorati Tags: , ,

Delighting customers and clients: Doing the thing that no one thought to ask for

As real estate professionals, our clients’/customers’ satisfaction with our service and the outcome of their transactions is unquestionably key to business success. In fact, I’d bet this has been true in every career you have ever had. It sure has been for me… beginning with my first jobs as babysitter, then as counter help at The Red Barn, and then throughout my various corporate positions in management, finance and information technology. Whether my customer has been internal, external, faceless or my very best friend, I’ve always done very well by doing very well for him and her.

And so it’s always been maddening for me to see someone or some organization fail to recognize that the “customer is always right,” or if the customer isn’t right to help the customer become right… at least to try to help. We all know the adage that a happy customer will tell someone else about his satisfactory experience, but an unhappy customer will tell the unhappy story ten times more often. Well, I want to tell you about great customer service that I was just the happy recipient of.

But first some background… It begins with Greg and me wanting to attract more clients than we were getting from reputation alone. Around the end of the amazing sellers’ market of 2004/2005, around the first anniversary of BloodhoundRealty.com, we hoped to jump-start our business by giving someone who didn’t know us personally (or through referral) a reason to believe that we put our clients’ interests above our own. We wanted to offer something more tangible than a motto or a sincere-looking pose. We were doing well when we took listings, but we were turning down more listings than we were accepting, because home owners, who didn’t yet know us, didn’t yet believe us that the buyers were no longer willing to pay top dollar. So we figured we would try to attract buyers by offering to let them keep their money in their pockets — money they would be paying the seller to pay to us. We thought that once we got this word out, we would Read more

What’s Wrong with zipRealty?

Some readers here may be a bit concerned that some of the writers here on BloodhoundBlog don’t find and report enough negative comments about various discount real estate companies. Relax. There is more.

I received the following email today from Dave Marron. As you will see, he is a former executive for Zip Realty.

__

Hi Russell:

I saw that you posted on bloodhound about zipRealty awhile back. Did you see their earnings release the other day? I’m an ex-zip exec (and ex-KW broker) and I put my thoughts down on paper about the state of their company (see attached). Do you have any use for this? If not, it’s OK. I just thought I’d shoot it over to you in case you thought it was bloggable.

Thanks,

Dave

What’s Wrong with zipRealty?

Last week zipRealty released their “preliminary” fourth quarter results. I’ve been interested in this company since 1999 when I went to ZipRealtylogowork for them. I
spent over four years at zip performing numerous jobs including VP of Sales. A couple of things popped out at me during their “preliminary” earning release conference call that just don’t make sense. Here are my observations.

One of the initiatives zip’s leaders gave for how they are going to improve in 2007 was an increased effort on training. Stock analyst Wendy Snow asked the team what they intend to do differently in the training arena that will make a difference in 2007. To this, Management answered that their “ideal candidate” would have the qualities of a strong trainer and strong real estate skills. They’ll also consider someone with strong training skills who could be “pick up the real estate craft quickly”. Are they kidding? They would hire a trainer who can “pick up the real estate craft quickly”. Would Pilsbuy, Madison and Sutro hire a legal trainer who could pick up the law craft quickly?

After leaving zipRealty I sold real estate for several years and I’m now an owner in a real estate technology company. The way that I learned the “real estate” craft was by going out and selling lots of homes. It’s not something that you can teach someone to Read more

Does Redfin.com have tougher agents or tougher clients? A challenge in Bloodhound red . . .

I represented the buyer in the sale of a home worth $450,000. Luxury home on the first tee of an exclusive golf course, right next to a million-dollar custom-home lot.

How much did we pay? $310,000.

Now the truth is, I had an ideally-situated buyer and we were working with an ideally-dys-situated seller. Fortune favors the well-prepared, but, in the end, we simply got lucky.

But if I wanted to, I could present that story in such a way that, by the time I finished warming your ears, you’d want to rename Wednesday after me. (Take that, Odin!)

And welcome to Redfinland. They’re determined to take a victory lap, and let ’em. As Kevin Boer said to me in email:

In all fairness to Redfin, if the numbers had come out the opposite, the re.net would have been all over it, showing it as “proof” that they suck.

Indeed. And as much as CEO Glenn Kelman resists the characterization of Redfin.com as a discount real estate brokerage, it remains that their marketing appeal is based on saving clients’ money. It’s hard to doubt that discount-seekers would be discount-finders.

But, as I discussed last night, Redfin’s results are not a slam-dunk validation of its agents skills, zeal, rigor, vigor or charm. The much more likely explanation for the results it reports is that its clients — unlike swimmingly-besotted house-lovers — are congenitally low-balling INTJs and INTPs who do not focus on anything that can’t be expressed numerically.

Tougher agents or tougher clients? There is a way to find out for sure. Last night I made this proposal to Kelman:

I’ll make you a deal. Send me PDF scans of the 170 files. I’ll make a server available for FTP, and y’all can redact for personal details. I can reconstruct a transaction from the file, so I can vet the quality of the work in full, not just as regards price. For example, I can see how complicated the deals are, and how much Redfin’s buyer’s agents are bringing to the transaction. I’ll report my findings in detail, and you can get your incredible PR machine to promote them far and wide. Read more

Thinking skeptically to rain on Redfin.com’s parade . . .

I’m not a Jesuit, but I play one on BloodhoundBlog. The real truth is, I’m a roll-your-own Jesuit, more auto-didact than anything. I didn’t have Brian Brady’s inestimable advantage of having had the gift of reason literally pounded into me. Instead, I had to stuff it between my own ears by hand. But one way or another, lay student or Brother, if you walk in the path of Ignatius Loyola, you learn to think skeptically. Any affirmative claim is far more likely to be false than true.

This morning, Redfin.com posted a claim that MLS results “prove” that Redfin agents are better negotiators than other agents in the Seattle area. If CEO Glenn Kelman had made a claim like this in Brother Paul’s class, he’d be up late tonight writing a paper, striving either to prove or disprove it.

The problem is not that the claim is necessarily false. The problem is that that there are so many ways that it might be false that, to call it true without eliminating each one of these canards and false paths is an inherently tendentious statement — suasion, not persuasion.

Before I begin work on my much shorter paper on why the claim is dubious, I want to raise three meta-issues. First, I do not have access to the underlying data. If I did, I might write a much longer and much more conclusive paper. Second, I would have much greater faith in the mainstream media if more reporters were tuned to a Jesuitical tenor of skepticism. And third, the tabbed browser window is an excellent tool for organizing the resources to be used in an exercise like this.

First, Redfin claims that its results rebut the claim that a salaried (and possibly inexperienced) agent will not negotiate as aggressively as a traditional real estate agent working on a straight commission compensation plan:

After a year in the market, we decided to put our theory to the test, by querying the Northwest Multiple Listing Service for data on every home or condominium sold via a brokerage from February 6, 2006 (the date of Redfin Direct’s launch) through February Read more

The Carnival of Real Estate . . .

…is up at The Real Estate Zebra. Host Daniel Rothamel is one of our favorite real estate webloggers, so it’s a double honor to have our own Kris Berg win yet again for The ABC’s of Agent Hiring – Oops, They Did it Again. This is Kris’ second win and the fourth for BloodhoundBlog.

This week’s Carnival of Real Estate Investing is at TheMillionairesBlog. We entered Michael Cook‘s Negotiation 201: Don’t Just Think about the Best Price, but it didn’t take first place, alas.

There is much good reading at both weblogs. Go take a look…

Technorati Tags: ,

The truth will set you free — but your chains are forged from sob stories . . .

I was at a party about 13 months ago, a going away party for one of my clients whose house we had just sold. I had sold the hostess her house, and somehow or another we started talking about 80/20 loans — nothing down financing. She had just refinanced to retire the second mortgage, so she had 20% equity in her home at next-to-nothing in out-of-pocket costs.

All around the room, people started nodding and saying 80/20, 80/20. They had all done the same thing, a room full of young homeowners with their homeownership made possible by the no-PMI piggy-back loan.

This is Peter Coy in Business Week’s Hot Property:

Is Your Mortgage Choking You?

For an article in BW, I’m looking to interview people who have subprime ARM mortgages and are feeling squeezed by resets.

A few weeks ago, Coy admitted that margins of error in statistical reporting render much of it meaningless. I have never worked with a sub-prime borrower, but I would expect that, among the stories of people being “choked,” there must also be stories of people who bought homes they would not otherwise have been able to purchase, homes they have subsequently refinanced with conforming loans.

“Proof by anecdote” is bogus in the first place, since anecdotes abound (and they’re much easier than real estate to improve). But surely there are countervailing anecdotes for almost any phenomenon. This might seem to argue for presenting “both sides” of the story. To me, it suggests a better approach. An anecdote in a news article is almost always a fallacious Appeal to Emotion dressed up as testimony. With two or three sad tales, the reporter implies that a situation that might be quite rare is in fact ubiquitous — and that the “solution” propounded requires no rational defense. Facts are facts, and surely thoughtful people can digest them without all that saccharine. Why not leave the anecdotes out altogether…?

Technorati Tags: ,

Sales Success Training?

Stack of $100 bills - smallerMost of the national real estate sales trainers training today are selling worthless crap. Want proof? Buy their stuff and see if you can apply any of it and actually make your business better.

Most of the real estate magazine articles that are chock full of “what agents ought to be doing” are written by well intentioned people who either were never successful at selling real estate for a living or never did.

One of the most high profile agents in the world endlessly promotes that he will share (if you sign up for his fabulous training program) how he became so successful. He is quite successful and it would seem logical that he could share quite a bit that would help. One of the main things he “shares” is a cluttered looking clone website that you can buy from him. I’m not quite sure how that website helped him so much as he was fantastically successful before the internet existed.

One trainer (rhymes with fairy) knowingly lies from the stage.

Most agents who enter the business (13 out of 14 by actual count) will be gone in a year or two. Can that be changed by “learning about success”? I really doubt it, as most of them didn’t have much commitment to ever really apply themselves. But that doesn’t include everyone – there are a LOT of people in the real estate business who want to do better and aren’t sure what to do next.

I’m planning on doing something about that. Over the years I have figured out what is involved – exactly – to go from “0 – 60” and I also know what is not involved. We are going to make that information broadly available. Free. Free, in the sense that we won’t be charging any money for any of it. Period. We won’t be endlessly attempting to get new people to listen to the audio or watch the videos because it makes us more money. Our only goal will be to see Read more