I’m thirsty, but not drinking the Kool-aid just yet
The NAR project formally known as the Gateway, a mash-up of all real estate data in the country, has now been relabeled The Real Estate Channel (TREC). There has been a new “interim” report issued by the Presidential Advisory Group (PAG), but still there is very little detailed information about NAR’s plan.
The new report makes it clear that the intent of TREC is NOT to be a national MLS or have a public access point (other than REALTORS®). These two clarifications will ease the fears of many local MLS systems and REALTORS® who were worried about the Gateway project. For others, the idea of a national MLS is appealing and they are still thinking that eventually TREC will become a national MLS, but they are keeping quiet about the prospect for now.
Not making the data publicly accessible is a similar situation. If you are against public access to data (read: still haven’t made the shift to reality), you will feel good about the new clarification. If you don’t worry about your clients having access to data, you will be happy with the report because you know that eventually such a massive mash-up will become available to the public.
So, what the current report says is that NAR will set aside the controversial aspects of the project for now. This seems like a good compromise to keep things moving forward although is does not feel particularly honest. So I find myself struggling between integrity and progress – between trust and fear – between belief and skepticism. Someone referred to the issue in terms of the Wizard of Oz – is there really anything behind the curtain?
The difficulty with this issue is that NAR does not have the details/answers to the questions because this is still a work in progress. This lack of answers causes fear because it is human nature to fill in information voids with negative beliefs. There is so much still unknown about TREC, that there is a lot of negative stuff being made up or inserted into the general thinking on Read more
mechanics tells us that a ball is made up of atoms, but Newton’s laws still work just fine. You can predict the ball’s trajectory without knowing that the ball is made up of atoms.