Remember when Enron was still everyone’s darling? Remember when they were a high flying company that could do no wrong?
Remember when AOL was high flying and had the audacity to buy Time Warner?
Or even Bear Stearns? Kmart, Qwest, MCI/Worldcom, Lucent Technology, Arthur Andersen, all were at one time ‘highly regarded’ companies that lost a huge percent of their value. That’s a ‘top of head,’ list without considering the Airlines.
There are countless more examples of big companies getting wiped out in a day. People’s pensions are inevitably the big story. Middle class families get wiped out because they had all of their ducks in one basket. Employees sue the company because senior executives didn’t tell them that there were risks inherent in the stock. The media has their normal pity party. But the real shame? Nobody stops to think for a second: no matter how good the company, is it sane to put all of your money in one place?
When I get on someone about blogging (un artfully), the real message was meant to be this: if you only have one widget for getting money, you’re nuts, and you’ll be destroyed someday. Maybe not soon, but someday. It might, temporarily, be a most efficient to do what works, and chase a single source of leads. How was business done 15 years ago? We didn’t predict the nature of today’s changes. Blogging is great, and it might last a long time. But you cant operate with the assumption that it’s going to be here. That leads to complacency and obsolescence.
To have a healthy business, you have to have many sources of income and leads, so if one of ’em dries up, you’re not on the streets. Because…no matter how good the widget, no matter how efficient the model, you MUST have several great sources for your business. It’s a baseline survival requirement for this new market.
What would happen to you if the top 2 sources of leads dried up in a short time. Even if ROI Read more






