There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Real Estate (page 251 of 266)

Economist Elliott Pollack’s housing market analysis

Phoenix and Tucson housing market analysis from Elliott Pollack:

The economic fundamentals that have allowed Greater Phoenix to prosper have not changed.

Our long term forecast remains positive.

Note this slide:

That’s ostensibly bad news, since our affordability is down substantially over the last 6 years. But what’s interesting to me is that the cities Phoenix drains population from are all substantially less affordable. That doesn’t mean things will necessarily go well here, but it tends to argue that they will be worse there.

Pollack’s estimate is that we have about two years to absorb excess inventory in greater Phoenix.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Only in the Valley of the Sun is a home built in the 1950s considered historic . . .

There’s a charming story in today’s Republic about the push to designate a small subdivision of tract homes in Scottsdale as an historic district:

With roomy kitchens and big kid-friendly yards, the homes were built during Scottsdale’s boom. Soldiers were returning home from World War II and Motorola came to town. People needed a place to live.

“Everybody around here worked for Motorola,” said Darlene Petersen, 76, a longtime community activist.

Forty-seven years ago, she and her late husband moved from Davenport, Iowa, into their home on Wilshire Drive near 73rd Street. She was a registered nurse. He was a printer displaced by a strike.

They both found jobs in the boomtown. Darlene spent more than 30 years as an operating room nurse, and her husband got a job as a printer.

The Petersens paid $11,000 for the 1,500-square-foot house that came with concrete floors and no cooler. Still, they were enticed by its Midwest-style front porch and the wide covered patios across the back. And there was the generous backyard, where geraniums and vines flourish under the shade of a very senior mulberry tree.

“People say it is so relaxing back here,” she said.

The name of the neighborhood is “Scottsdale Estates 4.” That by itself tells you that these are production homes, neither historically distinctive nor esthetically distinct. Properly speaking, it’s a neighborhood of tear-downs awaiting a higher and better use.

But the Valley of the Sun is so afraid of being looked down on by older cities that it races around adopting all the silly policies that make those older cities sclerotic and uninhabitable. We won’t be satisfied until more people move out than move in, just like the cities celebrated in all the hip urban planning books.

But, even so, it’s cute and charming and funny that, in order to have “historic districts,” we have to make hallowed museums out of homes that would be considered fairly new anywhere else…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Republic: Year-over-year median prices down in some areas . . .

Here’s the Republic‘s read on yesterday’s housing numbers, a much more dire interpretation:

Valley home prices dipped again in August, even falling below last year’s levels in some areas.

It is the first time since the Valley’s housing market turned red-hot in late 2004 that the monthly median price of existing homes in some areas is lower than it was the same month the year before, according to the Arizona Real Estate Center at Arizona State University Polytechnic. And if the August median price of $262,500 holds steady or declines this month, the region’s median price will be below the September 2005 price of $263,000.

Jim Rounds, a senior economist with the Scottsdale-based consulting firm Elliott D. Pollack & Cos., said price declines in many parts of metropolitan Phoenix are just beginning and could continue until early 2007.

Also, he said, “new-home price reductions are right around the corner” for the Valley as the housing market’s oversupply issue is corrected.

This much is interesting:

For the first eight months of 2006, there were 47,515 used-home sales Valley-wide, which isn’t close to the 78,935 recorded in 2005.

Last year isn’t a perfect comparison because of the investor-buyer frenzy that has left the housing market with a hangover this year, but home sales this year have also fallen below 2004’s more normal level of 68,020. They are closer to 2003’s pace, when 47,255 used homes changed hands.

The boom in Phoenix real estate started in March 2004 if not earlier, so 2003 is the last normal year for comparison purposes. In other words, the Phoenix market is essentially normal on the buyer’s side.

We have a surfeit of inventory on the seller’s side, but we don’t have is the kind of fire-sale pricing you would expect if most of those sellers were actually motivated to sell — as opposed to being interested in selling if the price is right.

The interesting — and possibly dispositive — question is whether new-home builders actually will cut prices. They’re discounting heavily against list prices for inventory homes right now, but that’s a matter of clearing a finite amount of standing inventory. If pre-built homes are selling Read more

Negotiating buyer representation: “Real estate is probably the only industry that doesn’t respect fully the person who pays . . .”

On the general topic of buyer representation, Jim Duncan at Real Central VA has a post up about being very choosy about which clients he will take on.

Interestingly, Jim provides a link to a specimen copy of a Virgina Asscoation of Realtors Buyer Broker Exclusive Employment Agreement.

I think this is a fine idea. We make copies of all of the commonly-used Arizona buyer contract forms available on our web site. Here is a link to a specimen copy of an Arizona Asscoation of Realtors Buyer Broker Exclusive Employment Agreement.

We are talking about how we might prepare this document differently, but for now we amend it as follows: The compensation listed on line 17 is “$10.00 or any mutually-agreeable sum.” The retainer fee on line 25 is “$0.00.” And at line 48 we add our standard firing clause: “This agreement will be terminated without recourse upon written notice by either party.”

My essay on empowering the buyer to negotiate the fees for their own representation is included in this week’s Carnival of Business at My 1st Million at 33. Frugal accuses me of being unfocused, to which my sole retort is a diffused glare, but adds this:

It really angers me that the sellers and the agents just don’t know who comes up with the loan or cash to pay their bills. Real estate is probably the only industry that doesn’t respect fully the person who pays.

I think that is beyond brilliant…

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Information wants to be free — and browsers just want to shop without being hassled . . .

On 360 Digest Gary Hodges asks Marlo Harris about the wisdom of letting people search from the IDX system on a Realtor’s web site without registering on the site:

Now, knowing that this service probably cost thousands of dollars to provide; shouldn’t there be some way to “enroll” them in this service, with the hopes that the “searcher” will make contact with that agent and/or mortgage broker?

Gary (and anyone else with this point of view), what you can do instead is make your site sticky, and then use that to build loyalty rather than trying to capture it.

Some people have the opinion that people won’t value anything that they get for free, and to a certain extent I agree. But, we’re not selling information. It’s already available for free. We’re building relationships. I think prospects can be frightened off by having to blow their anonymity on your site, just to get something another agent’s site will give them free access to.

As in Marlow’s case, someone who comes to our IDX page to search the full Phoenix/Scottsdale-area MLS system needs to submit an email address only if they want to have listings sent automatically when something new comes up with the features they identified. People can understand that if they want something to be sent to them they need to give us an address to send to. But I expect most people want to browse listings without having that ever-present worry that an agent is going to start bugging them, which of course is a concern anyone has as soon as personal information is requested… make that required.

Instead of quid pro quo — you get to see my information (homes listed on MLS) if I get to see yours (contact information) — we want for you to feel free to freely browse listings from our site. Curl up in your chair, sip a cup of tea, and browse on BloodhoundRealty.com all day… for months if you want. While you’re at it, take a look at other buyer tools BloodhoundRealty.com has to offer. And then browse on over to the BloodhoundBlog to get to Read more

More August housing numbers for the Phoenix area . . .

Dr. Jay Butler of ASU has his August numbers out, and his report is faithfully echoed by The Business Journal of Phoenix. The big news: 2006 is not 2005. Who knew? The real news? August was not great but not awful. You heard it here first, And second. Fifth place will go to the Arizona Republic, probably with a lot more spin…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Nine 9/11 links . . .

Gaping void:

Douglas Heddings at True Gotham isn’t writing about real estate today, and I understand and respect his reasons. It’s business as usual here today, but also for a 9/11 reason. I didn’t show for 29 days in a row after the attacks. You could say it’s a testament to American fortitude that we able to swallow hard and get on with it in only a month — but at the time it didn’t seem quite that fast.

In that spirit, Jim Duncan discusses the costs and benefits of being a Realtor on call.

I missed this when it appeared last week, but Marlow Harris weighs in on a weighty and serendipitously titled topic: Real Estate Agent Jihad.

It doesn’t do to insist that the sky cannot fall. Five years ago today it did. But The Real Estate Bloggers have a nice take on bubble frenzy: “Will we see the huge housing increases again for a while on a national level, probably not. But will we see wholesale carnage on the horizon? I sincerely doubt it. A deep breath and a little logic will go a long way to understanding the market.” Amen.

On the subject of phlegmatic logic, The Phoenix Real Estate Guy publishes something I’ve been dying to see: A 35-year interest rate chart. I’m going to blow it up and stick on the wall in my office.

Also at The Real Estate Bloggers (blogrolled), a link to a slide-show of the Freedom Towers in New York.

Whether the topic is 9/11, real estate — enbubbled or not — interest rates or something else, today is a good day to try on your blogging shoes. Sellsius° is offering an open mike to people who have something to say but don’t have a weblog of their own.

Wired: 9/11: Birth of the Blog.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Caesar’s wife on the witness stand: The moral, the practical, the marketable and the defensible approach to forbidding dual agency . . .

I had a great letter today from Bob Hunter of the Muljat Group about our policy forbidding dual agency. I’ll quote the whole thing first:

Greg, my wife and I are agents in Bellingham, Wash and I have a question relating to your position on dual agency. Our brokerage is a 100% desk fee operation. The broker takes no cut from any commission. Why would a transaction between two agents from this office harm either of the parties? I have read your website (twice) and think I understand your philosophy (since your make it very prevalent marketing appears to be a pretty important motivator also). Still, in our situation I’m not sure how the clients are harmed.

We have tried different strategies, I represent one client, my wife the other, referring one client to another agent in our office, representing both clients. We have not yet referred to an agent out of our office. In all the years of doing this, we do more dual agency than the industry standard, I can think of only one instance where the buyer ‘felt’ his interests were not being represented fully. The transaction would have the same result with separate agents but any bad feelings are negative. In retrospect we should have contributed money to his cause which would have alleviated any feelings of misplaced loyalty.

If dual agency is outlawed and if the consumers rail against it, then it is a moot point, but I am still interested in your opinion of our office dynamics and why it is not equitable or ethical.

I read your blog regularly and hope to start my own.

thanks

Bob Hunter
The Muljat Group Realtors

Dual agency has a bad reputation for three reasons, only one of which is wholly deserved. That one is true double-dipping agents or brokers who are looking for the biggest payday regardless of who gets hurt. Second is the public’s perception of dual agency, which is colored to some degree by negative opinions about real estate agents generally. But third is the conviction, justified or not, on the part of buyers and sellers that dual agency resulted in unfair Read more

The FSBO and BUBBA variety hour: How to make the buyer’s agents dance . . .

Our friend, colleague and personal marketing god, Richard Riccelli is getting ready to FSBO his Boston townhouse. He’s spent a year planning this down to the last detail, including condo-izing his property into two apartments so that they can be sold separately — or together if someone wants a residence plus servant’s quarters.

Richard was all over the idea of being a risk-loving seller, offering “broker participation” in such a way that a buyer can choose what, if anything, to pay for representation. This is the language he’s using on his promotional materials:

Buyers or buyer-designated brokers receive 2.5% of sale price at closing.

Perfect! A 2.5% commission is normal in Boston, and agents are always looking for that “broker participation” rider on a FSBO sign before they’ll invest any effort. But if a buyer wants to come in as a BUBBA — a buyer unrepresented by a buyer’s agent — the money’s there for closing costs or whatever.

It’s not quite right out there that the buyer can decide how that money is to be divided, if the buyer hires an agent, but there is nothing to keep the buyer from figuring it out. Either way, Richard gets what he wants: Avid interest either from buyers or from their agents.

With three exceptions, the silence from the real estate community on the idea of paying the buyer to pay the agent, rather than paying the agent directly, has been deafening. But there is more to real estate than Realtors. Unrepresented and semi-unrepresented sellers aren’t going to be invited to the Association of Realtors golf tournaments anyway. Writing their “broker participation” language the way Richard did makes perfect sense for them.

And that’s why it makes sense for Realtors, too. Whether they are correct or not, many people believe they can buy a home by themselves. In states where one or more attorneys are going to be involved anyway, they just might be right. Even in Arizona, if you have identified the property, agreed with the seller on terms and have effected the due diligence amicably, a title company will do all the necessary paperwork in exchange Read more

Fanmail — or fanning the flames mail: “So maybe you should just sit back and keep your mouth shut . . . “

Here’s an email I got regarding this week’s Arizona Republic column, detailing how the buyer actually pays the “seller paid closing costs”:

Hello Greg,

I was incensed at your first article about the buyer paying for everything but I didn’t feel the need to waste my time writing to you.

However, now you seem to just be digging yourself a deeper hole. You have now enraged BOTH the buyers and sellers. Good for you!

Obviously, if you had such a response to your article by agents and brokers, I would think that you would take time to pause to realize just what you did to our industry. But now you insist on pounding your ridiculous theory yet another week. You’re only making a fool of yourself. And buyers and sellers will realize this too.

It’s sad to see someone like you in the industry. Your article about dual agency was also way off base. Remember, we’re all in this together. So maybe you should just sit back and keep your mouth shut.

Regards,
Cindy Kingery

Cindy Kingery, Associate Broker, e-Pro
Windermere Real Estate/Surprise

Just as a matter of reference, the calls I get from ordinary people, not Realtors or brokers, are overwhelmingly supportive. But also as a matter of reference, the calls I get from Realtors and brokers are almost always line-blocked, and rarely do I get so much as a first name out of those callers. Cindy is to be commended for putting her name behind her words.

That said, I disagree that “we’re all in this together”. I think that attitude perfectly encapsulates what is wrong with real estate brokerage as it is currently practiced. I work for — and only for — my clients. If other Realtors make money as the result of my efforts, that’s a secondary consequence. My entire loyalty is owed to my clients. After that, I owe a duty of honesty to everyone. The buyer pays for everything in a real estate transaction. That’s the truth. To say anything else, or to “keep [my] mouth shut”, would be dishonest.

I have better surprises for you, Cindy. This week I plan to disclose how Read more

Overall August real estate market results for MLS listed homes in the Phoenix area

In the Arizona Regional Multiple Listings Service at large, 6,170 homes sold in August against an inventory of 46,830, an implied absorption rate of 7.6 months. There are 6,185 properties listed as “Sale Pending.” All of these numbers are largely unchanged from July.

The historical numbers make it plain that we did not experience the traditional selling season, but they also make it plain that a simplistic year-over-year analysis — which we can expect from the Arizona Republic a week or more from now — is misleading.

Number of Homes Sold (with Days on Market)

March 2003   6471    67
          2004   8678    60
          2005   9959    36
          2006   7469    58

April    2003   7429    67
          2004   8889    61
          2005   9567    32
          2006   6725    60

May   2003   7428    67
          2004   8932    56
          2005   9853    27
          2006   7582    63

June   2003     7409    67
          2004    9969    55
          2005   10225    26
          2006    7209    67

July   2003     7643    64
          2004    8974    51
          2005    9326    25
          2006    6101    70

August 2003     7648    63
          2004    8968    47
          2005    9996    25
          2006    6170    76

Prices are virtually unchanged as well. The average sales price for a closed MLS transaction in July was $332,426. For the month of August, the average was $331,266, a net loss of about 0.35%.

Note that this may not accurately reflect the Phoenix-area real estate market as a whole. All private sales and most new-home builder sales are excluded from MLS statistics. However, for MLS-represented resale homes, the month of August was virtually a repeat of July — a few more transactions taking a few more days to sell for marginally less money. If the pending sales are any indication, September may be more of the same.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,