There’s always something to howl about.

Category: Blogging (page 66 of 84)

The Zillow.com shake-down: Preparing for the denouement . . .

Via Matrix, The New York Times:

Zillow.com, the Web site that provides free home valuations, has been accused by a coalition of community activist groups of undervaluing the homes in black and Latino neighborhoods.

The headline of the story: “A Home Valuation Web Site Is Accused of Discrimination.” I said the headline would be “Computerized Redlining,” but this is The New York Times, the dignified hand-maiden of the left. In any case, the charges of racism will get more hysterical until Zillow.com either pays up or shuts this shake-down down.

But why is this article in the Times today, when this “news” broke last week? To soften Zillow.com up, to let them know what they’re in for if they resist.

If you want something to be frightened about on Halloween, here it is…

Our story so far:

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Zillow.com shake-down: BloodhoundBlog’s take so far — and a chance to win a BloodhoundRealty.com Tee Shirt . . .

If Inman Blog sent you here, here is our side of the story so far:

A question might arise in a thoughtful mind: Why am I defending Zillow.com from this outrage?

First, because they have the right to run their business however they choose. If I can persuade them to add a disclaimer to their front page, that’s great. If not, it’s still their business, their private property.

Second, and of much greater importance, if Zillow.com caves in to extortion, that will open the net up for raids by every flavor of “non-profit” piracy. It is very rare that anyone can make any difference at all in the way things are done. This is one of those times, a transition point, and what Zillow.com does may have decisive impact on future events. Will the net become another corporate cash-box for “non-profit” groups who will — for a fee — “protect” you from legislation they got passed? Or will the net remain the exception to the way business is done in America?

The Future of Real Estate Marketing has more today, as does Realty Thoughts. For my own part, I believe the crux of the issue is racial politics and Fair Housing legislation, rather than the plights of starving appraisers or disgruntled Realtors. These groups may have their own axes to grind, but every NCRC shake-down I have been able to uncover has been related to Fair Housing law or the Community Reinvestment Act.

These are the three instances I have found, having invested less then ten minutes’ research time:

  1. NCRC routinely shakes-down banks.
  2. NCRC shakes-down lender for red-lining. Note that the article reads like the lender was fined, but the payment actually went to NCRC.
  3. NRT hires NCRC to teach its Fair Housing classes. In this instance, NCRC was the white-hat protector called in to fend off the black-hat protectors.

My belief is that fleas don’t come in threes: If every story I found Read more

The Carnival of Real Estate . . .

…is up already at Jim Duncan’s Real Central VA. The pingback in my mailbox said 4:27 am. Arizona doesn’t change time zones, so I have no idea what time it is anywhere today, but clearly someone was burning the midnight oil in his pumpkin.

Jim Cronin from The Real Estate Tomato takes first place, just as he is about to host his own Halloween Carnival.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tab-surfing: Cataloging my collection of good posts…

It really is a matter of browser tabs. I live in Safari for the Mac, and if I see something in Vienna, my RSS feed reader, that I want to explore, I’ll open the window, then slide the tab over to another open window that is already full of tabs. I end up with a sort of codex of open browser windows, each one stuffed with elemental goodness. Every once in a while, I catalog my collections of tabs. At that point, the marginal cost of doing so publicly is nil, and there’s a good chance I can share with you something important you might have missed. Now you know my secret method…

It’s a six-month-a-versary at The San Diego Home Blog. It turns out all the great RE.net raconteurs are in San Diego. Kris Berg has some thoughts on MLS fragmentation, as well.

Jeff Brown, the other great San Diego spinner of yarns, wants you to think about the relative merits of stocks versus real estate.

Bonnie Erickson has thoughts on the call for underperforming Minnesota Realtors to have a glass of Kool-Ade, as does Daniel Rothamel.

Dustin Luther at Rain City Guide has four posts (so far) on the Seattle Blog Business Summit. My skeptometer may need re-calibration, but I’m wondering if there is a difference between being well-known and being well-thought-out. Austin Bay got to interview Donald Rumsfeld this week, you tell me why. Robert Scoble, who praises Zillow.com because it’s always wrong in his experience, advises webloggers to “write well.” Ya think?

Here’s real news, in any case: WordPress 2.0.5 has been released.

John L. Wake at the Arizona Real Estate Notebook has found someone with the perfect solution to high land costs in San Francisco and Manhattan…

BloodhoundBlog is four months old tomorrow. Technorati says we’re linked by 180 weblogs so far. RSS Pieces has advice on how to boost traffic 40% in one hour per day. Here’s my advice, an elaboration on the philosophy of the inestimable Robert Scoble: Write well, write wisely, write often — and don’t please anyone more than you please yourself. Quantity matters a whole lot less than Read more

The Zillow.com shake-down: How the other shoe will drop . . .

Lloyd Frink at Zillow.com is playing CYOA games, and Joseph Ferrera at Sellsius&176; is looking for truth from a horse that’s all ass, but here is how the other shoe will drop, in the Zillow.com shake-down, when it does:

Watch for a joint announcement of something that Zillow.com and NCRC will do together. There will be a window-dressing “solution” to the manufactured dispute, perhaps a more robust disclaimer. This, whatever it is, will be nothing but a show horse. The pay-off will be in the joint program, whatever form it takes.

Clint Bollick or someone like that might file a suit solely in pursuit of a policy change. The NCRC will expect to get money or power or both. They’re playing straight out of the Jesse Jackson playbook, and they will not stop maligning Zillow.com until they get what they want or until their tactics are fully exposed.

It would not surprise me if the payoff came from the personal fortunes of Rich Barton and Lloyd Frink, to keep the VCs and the SEC out of it.

When you see a press release like the one I cited yesterday from NRT, you’ll know the deal is done. Read that press release carefully and you should be able to figure out what the payoff is. Learn to read everything that carefully and you will discover how America works.

There is an alternative: They could stand firm. The web has fairly successfully held itself aloof from the way America works for the rest of corporate America. To my knowledge, this is the first time a purely web-based company has been shaken down in this manner. Because of this — because the web has been exempt from this kind of officious thievery so far — it is a matter of particular moment whether Zillow.com is able to hold the line.

I would love it if they did, but I honestly don’t expect it. Except for people like Steve Jobs and Mark Kuban, corporations are run by cowards. Most likely, they’ll try to save face with a seven-figure bribe, then set up a fund to buy off future pirates, who will Read more

Zillow.com shake-down: Creeping disclaimerism as a subject-changing gambit . . .

Whatever. Just don’t pay them off. The issue is a lot bigger than Zillow.com, and Net Exceptionalism is too important an idea to be squandered.

Even if you don’t know who your friends are, I will hang with you if you will hang tough…

Our story so far:

Technorati Tags: , ,

Zillow.com shake-down: This is the first shoe dropping . . .

John Cook, Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

Zillow has contacted the NCRC, and the two plan to meet soon, Berenbaum said. He expressed confidence that they can resolve the issues in a way that benefits the entire home valuation industry.

Actually, the complaint made me think that Yahoo.com is going to have to cough up some dough, too…

Our story so far:

Technorati Tags: , ,

Home buyers: How to horsewhip your buyer’s agent to get to a reasonable fee . . .

Even though I have yet to persuade a home buyer to whipsaw sellers using my strategy, I thought I would pass along a tip for buyers on getting a better deal from your buyer’s agent — no matter where you might happen to be.

I happens that I have a friend who is moving soon, but not to Phoenix, alas. He took my advice and asked the question — “How much do you charge?” — of a potential buyer’s agent. The answer he got in return was rich in tap-dancing but not in results, so I wrote a model follow-up, shown below, for pressing the point.

Before we get to that, we need to consider some issues.

First, a rebate from your buyer’s agent may not be lawful in your state. I consider this absurd and obscene, but your state’s Association of Realtors may be keeping your state legislature as a special pet.

Second, if homes sell for lousy money where you’re buying, don’t get cheeky. A 3% commission on a $60,000 house is eighteen-hundred bucks. I consider that starvation wages, a clarion call to local Realtors to “find your passion” elsewhere.

But, third, a premium price is only justified for a premium product. If you’re buying investment real estate, you should pay Jeff Brown whatever he wants. But ordinary buyer’s agents are not a scarce commodity — too much the contrary. If a prospective agent huffs and puffs that he’s worth more because he charges more — press on. If an agent really is too busy to work with you, she might actually be worth more money — but she might not be able to deliver the value anyway.

But: Right now, the world is crawling with underemployed Realtors. If one won’t make a deal, the next one will — if you are willing to negotiate to hang onto your own money.

Here’s the language that I wrote, which you can easily adapt to your own circumstances:

Dear Realtor:

I do anticipate working with a buyer’s agent when I make my move. However, I believe I am justified in regarding myself as “a bird in the hand” for several Read more

Welcome to Race Piracy 2.0: Zillow.com is targetted for the crime of having deep pockets . . .

Heads up, folks. It’s a shake-down.

Poor Zillow.com has gotten itself caught up in a classic Jesse Jackson-style shake-down. This is specious bullshit, and everyone who cares about justice — and about not having the rest of the net raped by posturing diversity pirates — should line up with the Zestimators.

They should disclose openly that the damn gizmo is a toy — but what moron doesn’t already know this in his heart of hearts? But they’re hoist by their own petard, because their pretense to a vast scientific “accuracy” is what is being used against them.

Here’s the worst of it, Zillow.com will probably wuss out and pay these crooks off, just like Coldwell Banker did.

Welcome to Race Piracy 2.0…

Our story so far:

Technorati Tags: , ,

Lam chops: More links back to the self-motivating conversation . . .

The Future of Real Estate Marketing rolled its own Google-based real estate search tool, as did BlueRoof.com. I think these are really sweet ideas about which I intend to do nothing, but I would gleefully hit a tip jar if someone were to set up a canonical real estate search on its own domain or on a third.level.domain on an existing site. Make it integrable and I’ll integrate it with credit into my sidebar. All the big-boy tools (Technorati, blogsearch) kinda suck, so a mission-critical real estate info search tool is a solid win.

I cited the Maverick entry at Mike’s Corner the other day, but I want to link back to it again. I think this is Serious Business, and it hasn’t gotten the hashing out it deserves. Daniel Rothamel from The Real Estate Zebra has a particularly insightful comment.

More from Three Oceans Real Estate — Electronic signatures: what are you waiting for? I’m on the lo-tech end of this, for now. I’m told it’s potentially legal in Arizona, but I haven’t dug through the nitty-gritty details.

Bonnie Erickson drew my attention to a post she put up on Active Rain in September: In changing from sub-agency to to buyer’s agency did with throw out the baby and keep the bath-water?

At 360Digest, Marlow Harris has a very thorough run-down on the relo racket.

RSS pieces (blogrolled) offers the “Top 5 secrets of successful blogs. I happened to hear from Jennifer Dizmang, who taught a class I took just lately on using self-directed retirement account to invest in real estate. That rocks, yes? Jennifer knows a whale of a lot of other stuff, too, all worth millions. Guess what she doesn’t know? Yup. She’s a blog-o-novice. She wants to take flight, but here wings aren’t ready. I sent her the RSS pieces piece, but if y’all have other ideas for her, you might send them along.

Hotpads.com wants you to know that it is courting controversy with electoral heat maps.

The XBroker (blogrolled) craves attention — but he earns it. This is a tearing back of the veils, and it’s kind of roughshod, even rapine, but Read more

Links on the lam: A series of interstitial notices . . .

I’m juggling stuff, so I’m going to try to sneak in some little things fast. There’s a lot of great stuff out there…

Pat Kitano at TransparentRE has a nice scary story for Halloween: The disintermediation of the bond traders.

Alive with numbers, Kevin Boer at Three Oceans Real Estate takes two spins of the Altos Research wheel and also calculates the financial clout of Zillow.com’s demographic.

Bonnie Erickson at Real Estate Snippets has nice advice on IRS Section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges and some sage tips for new real estate agents. Bonnie is in Minnesota, where new agents are more officiously advised to fall on their swords.

More later. Gotta race…

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Unbrokerage: How to profit from the glut of unproductive real estate agents . . .

Broker Bryant’s comment below put me in mind of a business model I invented earlier this year.

I spent my second two years in real estate in a brokerage such as Bryant describes: You pay a monthly fee to hang your license. If you produce — not encouraged — you pay a transaction fee plus an Errors and Omissions insurance premium. There were 185 agents in the brokerage, of which maybe 15 of us were doing more than one transaction a year. I was doing a lot more. I was there because it was the cheapest 100% plan available to me, because I knew they would leave me alone — which they did — and because I was biding my time until I could take the test for my broker’s license.

But it occurred to me that the NAR has got got be about one-third dead weight by now: Agents with style, charm and zeal — just no clients. Even so, an active real estate license is a valuable thing to have, even if you really are doing one or fewer deals a year.

On the other hand, you are only valuable to me as a broker if you are not increasing my liability. When you do nothing except pay me, I love you. When you write contracts or engage in other random acts of agency, you scare me.

Here’s the idea I had: You can hang your license with us for FREE. No monthly fees — forever. You arrange your own renewal hours and pay the state’s fees, but you own me nothing, and you can hang your license with me for free forever.

What’s the catch? You cannot ever write a contract or represent a client. You cannot do anything for which I can be sued. If you have a mother-in-law deal, that’s great. It will be handled by a working agent and you’ll get a 50% referral fee, with no nickel-and-dime brokerage fees deducted. Refer as many deals as you can — your referral fee is always 50%. You can’t do anything, but you can make a ton of money for doing nothing.

We Read more

Starving Realtors want to know: How do you charge a premium price for a commodity that is not in short supply?

I love it! Inman Blog cites an amazing open letter from the Minnesota Association of Realtors to its membership.

The gist: Real estate brokers are retards but it’s not their fault!

Wait, that’s not right. What it says is, if you’re not making money as a Realtor, you should probably quit now, because your broker won’t sever you, even though, by not severing you, he is hurting his business and the real estate industry as a whole.

What it really says is this: The real estate brokerage safe harbor exclusion to the federal income tax withholding laws makes real estate brokers behave like retards, only this time they can’t seem to grow another foot to shoot themselves in.

Too frolicking bad for them, huh?

Here’s an interesting question: How do you charge a premium price for a commodity that is not in short supply? The DeBeers diamond cartel has an answer. The National Association of Realtors does not…

Technorati Tags: , , ,

All the flat-fee features . . .

We’re in the business of offering a flat-fee for buyer’s representation, we have been for a while. Cathy and I have both written contracts with the flat-fee language. But where policy can be fast, promotion takes time, and it is not until midnight tonight that we will begin to promote the flat-fee idea.

Even then we’re kind of a slow roll out, because we want to make sure that, even if we end up with a tiger by the tail, we manage to stop that tiger, as it were.

I know there are people following this all over the country, so if you want to see all the flat-fee features we have built so far, click away.

As with everything Bloodhound, there is a philosophy. Either we hate the way everything else is done or we simply love to do things differently, but, either way, nothing is done the way anyone else does it.

For the print ads, we are deliberately violating the visual style of these kinds of things — in two different violations. I don’t see any way for a reader to regard us as being something different if we look just the same. The same goes for the content of the ads — and each is also radically different from the other. We don’t have an unlimited amount of money, so we’re starting with something akin to a binary tree search to see what works.

There are two Realtor.com ads that will work together. These may not seem to be as radical, but we put a lot of thought into getting the reader’s response, if we can but once get the reader’s attention.

Finally there is one web-based landing page, so far. I have a killer alternate within me somewhere, but it is killing me to get it out. The idea of the landing page is to get people who have voluntarily come in from the ads to take the next step, filling out a home search form and setting an appointment. The appointment will be the actual close, but our plan — for now, at least — is to have no hands-on involvement Read more